Did you know
that the US book and magazine industry sector
was responsible for the felling of 125 million trees in
2008? That's a lot of trees.
The average
conventional book has a carbon footprint of 7.5 kg of
CO2 during its lifetime. That's assuming that you have
it delivered by mail or courier. If you get in your car,
drive into the shopping district of town, buy your book and
then drive home again, the carbon footprint of your reading
material just doubled.
So it should
be no surprise to learn that Amazon Kindle is kinder to the
environment. Apart from the fact that no paper, ink or water
are used in the production of electronic books, the delivery
method – download from the Amazon
store using 3G wireless technology – is a
lot more environmentally friendly.
Of course, it
would be wrong to suggest that your Kindle has no
environmental impact. Obviously it consumes both
materials and energy during the manufacturing
process. It also requires electrical power to operate.
However, even taking these factors into
consideration, your Kindle e-book reader is still
much better for the environment than the continued use of
traditional printed books, magazines and
newspapers.
It is
estimated that in 2009, e-book readers will be “carbon
neutral” – the CO2 saved by the use of electronic media will
almost exactly balance the CO2 used to manufacture and power
the devices. Thereafter, as usage increases, the manufacture
and operating “cost” will be more than offset by the savings
obtained by avoiding the production and distribution of
traditional paper based books and magazines.

The graphic above shows
the estimated environmental impact of electronic book
readers between 2009 to 2012. The red bar shows the CO2
emissions produced as a result of the manufacture and sale
of e-book readers. The blue bar shows the CO2 emissions that
will be saved as a result of using electronic books rather
than the conventional paper type.
As you can see, in 2009
e-book readers are pretty much carbon neutral. The energy
and materials used to produce them is counterbalanced by the
savings in paper, ink, delivery of traditional books.
Thereafter, the blue bar savings start to be quite a bit
greater than the "cost" of producing the readers - a
positive environmental impact. So the more you use your
Kindle instead of buying paper editions, the more
environmentally friendly you'll be!
|